RULES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF REGISTRATION OF FOREIGN DEBT
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE LAW OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA
The National People’s Congress Order of the President of the People’s Republic of China No.16 The Administrative Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China which has been adopted at the Second Session of the Seventh National President of the People’s Republic of China: Yang Shangkun April 4, 1989 Administrative Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China ContentsChapter I General Provisions Chapter II Scope of Accepting Cases Chapter III Jurisdiction Chapter IV Participants in Proceedings Chapter V Evidence Chapter VI Bringing a Suit and Accepting a Case Chapter VII Trial and Judgment Chapter VIII Execution Chapter IX Liability for Compensation or Infringement of Rights Chapter X Administrative Procedure Involving Foreign Interests Chapter XI Supplementary Provisions Chapter I General Provisions Article 1 Pursuant to the Constitution, this Law is enacted for the purpose of ensuring the correct and prompt handling of administrative cases Article 2 If a citizen, a legal person or any other organization considers that his or its lawful rights and interests have been infringed upon Article 3 The people’s courts shall, in accordance with the law, exercise judicial power independently with respect to administrative cases, The people’s courts shall set up administrative divisions for the handling of administrative cases. Article 4 In conducting administrative proceedings, the people’s courts shall base themselves on facts and take the law as the criterion. Article 5 In handling administrative cases, the people’s courts shall examine the legality of specific administrative acts. Article 6 In handling administrative cases, the people’s courts shall, as prescribed by law, apply the systems of collegial panel, withdrawal Article 7 Parties to an administrative suit shall have equal legal positions. Article 8 Citizens of all nationalities shall have the right to use their native spoken and written languages in administrative proceedings. In an area where people of a minority nationality live in concentrated communities or where a number of nationalities live together, The people’s courts shall provide interpretation for participants in proceedings who do not understand the language or languages commonly Article 9 Parties to an administrative suit shall have the right to debate. Article 10 The people’s procuratorates shall have the right to exercise legal supervision over administrative proceedings. Chapter II Scope of Accepting Cases Article 11 The people’s courts shall accept suits brought by citizens, legal persons or other organizations against any of the following specific (1) an administrative sanction, such as detention, fine, rescission of a license or permit, order to suspend production or business or (2) a compulsory administrative measure, such as restricting freedom of the person or the sealing up, seizing or freezing of property, (3) infringement upon one’s managerial decision-making powers, which is considered to have been perpetrated by an administrative organ; (4) refusal by an administrative organ to issue a permit or license, which one considers oneself legally qualified to apply for, or its (5) refusal by an administrative organ to perform its statutory duty of protecting one’s rights of the person and of property, as one (6) cases where an administrative organ is considered to have failed to issue a pension according to law; (7) cases where an administrative organ is considered to have illegally demanded the performance of duties; and (8) cases where an administrative organ is considered to have infringed upon other rights of the person and of property. Apart from the provisions set forth in the preceding paragraphs, the people’s courts shall accept other administrative suits which Article 12 The people’s courts shall not accept suits brought by citizens, legal persons or other organizations against any of the following (1) acts of the state in areas like national defence and foreign affairs; (2) administrative rules and regulations, regulations, or decisions and orders with general binding force formulated and announced by (3) decisions of an administrative organ on awards or punishments for its personnel or on the appointment or relief of duties of its personnel; (4) specific administrative acts that shall, as provided for by law, be finally decided by an administrative organ. Chapter III Jurisdiction Article 13 The basic people’s courts shall have jurisdiction as courts of first instance over administrative cases. Article 14 The intermediate people’s courts shall have jurisdiction as courts of first instance over the following administrative cases: (1) cases of confirming patent rights of invention and cases handled by the Customs; (2) suits against specific administrative acts undertaken by departments under the State Council or by the people’s governments of provinces, (3) grave and complicated cases in areas under their jurisdiction. Article 15 The higher people’s courts shall have jurisdiction as courts of first instance over grave and complicated administrative cases in Article 16 The Supreme People’s Court shall have jurisdiction as a court of first instance over grave and complicated administrative cases in Article 17 An administrative case shall be under the jurisdiction of the people’s court in the locality of the administrative organ that initially Article 18 A suit against compulsory administrative measures restricting freedom of the person shall be under the jurisdiction of a people’s Article 19 An administrative suit regarding a real property shall be under the jurisdiction of the people’s court in the place where the real Article 20 When two or more people’s courts have jurisdiction over a suit, the plaintiff may have the option to bring the suit in one of these Article 21 If a people’s court finds that a case it has accepted is not under its jurisdiction, it shall transfer the case to the people’s court Article 22 If a people’s court which has jurisdiction over a case is unable to exercise its jurisdiction for special reasons, a people’s court If a dispute arises over jurisdiction between people’s courts, it shall be resolved by the parties to the dispute through consultation. Article 23 People’s courts at higher levels shall have the authority to adjudicate administrative cases over which people’s courts at lower levels If a people’s court deems it necessary for an administrative case of first instance under its jurisdiction to be adjudicated by a Chapter IV Participants in Proceedings Article 24 A citizen, a legal person or any other organization that brings a suit in accordance with this Law shall be a plaintiff. If a citizen who has the right to bring a suit is deceased, his near relatives may bring the suit. If a legal person or any other organization that has the right to bring a suit terminates, the legal person or any other organization Article 25 If a citizen, a legal person or any other organization, brings a suit directly before a people’s court, the administrative organ that For a reconsidered case, if the organ that conducted the reconsideration sustains the original specific administrative act, the administrative If two or more administrative organs have undertaken the same specific administrative act, the administrative organs that have jointly If a specific administrative act has been undertaken by an organization authorized to undertake the act by the law or regulations, If a specific administrative act has been undertaken by an organization as entrusted by an administrative organ, the entrusting organ If an administrative organ has been abolished, the administrative organ that carries on the exercise of functions and powers of the Article 26 A joint suit shall be constituted when one party or both parties consist of two or more persons and the administrative cases are against Article 27 If any other citizen, legal person or any other organization has interests in a specific administrative act under litigation, he or Article 28 Any citizen with no capacity to take part in litigation shall have one or more legal representatives who will act on his behalf in Article 29 Each party or legal representative may entrust one or two persons to represent him in litigation. A lawyer, a public organization, a near relative of the citizen bringing the suit, or a person recommended by the unit to which the Article 30 A lawyer who serves as an agent ad litem may consult materials pertaining to the case in accordance with relevant provisions, and With the approval of the people’s court, parties and other agents ad litem may consult the materials relating to the court proceedings Chapter V Evidence Article 31 Evidence shall be classified as follows: (1) documentary evidence; (2) material evidence; (3) audio-visual material; (4) testimony of witnesses; (5) statements of the parties; (6) expert conclusions; and (7) records of inquests and records made on the scene. Any of the above-mentioned evidence must be verified by the court before it can be taken as a basis for ascertaining a fact. Article 32 The defendant shall have the burden of proof for the specific administrative act he has undertaken and shall provide the evidence Article 33 In the course of legal proceedings, the defendant shall not by himself collect evidence from the plaintiff and witnesses. Article 34 A people’s court shall have the authority to request the parties to provide or supplement evidence. A people’s court shall have the authority to obtain evidence from the relevant administrative organs, other organizations or citizens. Article 35 In the course of legal proceedings, when a people’s court considers that an expert evaluation for a specialized problem is necessary, Article 36 Under circumstances where there is a likelihood that evidence may be destroyed or lost or difficult to obtain later on, the participants Chapter VI Bringing a Suit and Accepting a Case Article 37 A citizen, a legal person or any other organization may, within the scope of cases acceptable to the people’s courts, apply to an In circumstances where, in accordance with relevant provisions of laws or regulations, a citizen, a legal person or any other organization Article 38 If a citizen, a legal person or any other organization applies to an administrative organ for reconsideration, the organ shall make If the administrative organ conducting the reconsideration fails to make a decision on the expiration of the time limit, the applicant Article 39 If a citizen, a legal person or any other organization brings a suit directly before a people’s court, he or it shall do so within Article 40 If a citizen, a legal person or any other organization fails to observe the time limit prescribed by law due to force majeure or other Article 41 The following requirements shall be met when a suit is brought: (1) the plaintiff must be a citizen, a legal person or any other organization that considers a specific administrative act to have infringed (2) there must be a specific defendant or defendants; (3) there must be a specific claim and a corresponding factual basis for the suit; and (4) the suit must fall within the scope of cases acceptable to the people’s courts and the specific jurisdiction of the people’s court Article 42 When a people’s court receives a bill of complaint, it shall, upon examination, file a case within seven days or decide to reject Chapter VII Trial and Judgment Article 43 A people’s court shall send a copy of the bill of complaint to the defendant within five days of filing the case. The defendant shall Failure by the defendant to file a bill of defence shall not prevent the case from being tried by the people’s court. Article 44 During the time of legal proceedings, execution of the specific administrative act shall not be suspended. Execution of the specific (1) where suspension is deemed necessary by the defendant; (2) where suspension of execution is ordered by the people’s court at the request of the plaintiff because, in the view of the people’s (3) where suspension of execution is required by the provisions of laws or regulations. Article 45 Administrative cases in the people’s courts shall be tried in public, except for those that involve state secrets or the private affairs Article 46 Administrative cases in the people’s courts shall be tried by a collegial panel of judges or of judges and assessors. The number of Article 47 If a party considers a member of the judicial personnel to have an interest in the case or to be otherwise related to it, which may If a member of the judicial personnel considers himself to have an interest in the case or to be otherwise related to it, he shall The provisions of the two preceding paragraphs shall apply to court clerks, interpreters, expert witnesses and persons who conduct The withdrawal of the president of the court as the chief judge shall be decided by the court’s adjudication committee; the withdrawal Article 48 If the plaintiff refuses to appear in court without justified reasons after being twice legally summoned by the people’s court, the Article 49 If a participant in the proceedings or any other person commits any of the following acts, the people’s court may, according to the (1) evading without reason, refusing to assist in or obstructing the execution of the notice of a people’s court for assistance in its (2) forging, concealing or destroying evidence; (3) instigating, suborning or threatening others to commit perjury or hindering witnesses from giving testimony; (4) concealing, transferring, selling or destroying the property that has been sealed up, seized or frozen; (5) using violence, threats or other means to hinder the personnel of a people’s court from performing their duties or disturbing the (6) insulting, slandering, framing, beating or retaliating against the personnel of a people’s court, participants in proceedings or personnel A fine or detention must be approved by the president of a people’s court. Parties who refuse to accept the punishment decision may Article 50 A people’s court shall not apply conciliation in handling an administrative case. Article 51 Before a people’s court announces its judgment or order on an administrative case, if the plaintiff applies for the withdrawal of Article 52 In handling administrative cases, the people’s courts shall take the law, administrative rules and regulations and local regulations In handling administrative cases of a national autonomous area, the people’s courts shall also take the regulations on autonomy and Article 53 In handling administrative cases, the people’s courts shall take, as references, regulations formulated and announced by ministries If a people’s court considers regulations formulated and announced by a local people’s government to be inconsistent with regulations Article 54 After hearing a case, a people’s court shall make the following judgments according to the varying conditions: (1) If the evidence for undertaking a specific administrative act is conclusive, the application of the law and regulations to the act (2) If a specific administrative act has been undertaken in one of the following circumstances, the act shall be annulled or partially a. inadequacy of essential evidence; b. erroneous application of the law or regulations; c. violation of legal procedure; d. exceeding authority; or e. abuse of powers. (3) If a defendant fails to perform or delays the performance of his statutory duty, a fixed time shall be set by judgment for his performance (4) If an administrative sanction is obviously unfair, it may be amended by judgment. Article 55 A defendant who has been judged by a people’s court to undertake a specific administrative act anew must not, based on the same fact Article 56 In handling administrative cases, if a people’s court considers the head of an administrative organ or the person directly in charge Article 57 A people’s court shall pass a judgment of first instance within three months from the day of filing the case. Extension of the time Article 58 If a party refuses to accept a judgment of first instance by a people’s court, he shall have the right to file an appeal with the Article 59 A people’s court may handle an appealed case by examining the court records, if it considers the facts clearly ascertained. Article 60 In handling an appealed case, a people’s court shall make a final judgment within two months from the day of receiving the appeal. Article 61 A people’s court shall handle an appealed case respectively according to the conditions set forth below: (1) if the facts are clearly ascertained and the law and regulations are correctly applied in the original judgment, the appeal shall (2) if the facts are clearly ascertained but the law and regulations are incorrectly applied in the original judgment, the judgment shall (3) if the facts are not clearly ascertained in the original judgment or the evidence is insufficient, or a violation of the prescribed Article 62 If a party considers that a legally effective judgment or order contains some definite error, he may make complaints to the people’s Article 63 If the president of a people’s court finds a violation of provisions of the law or regulations in a legally effective judgment or If a people’s court at a higher level finds a violation of provisions of the law or regulations in a legally effective judgment or Article 64 If the people’s procuratorate finds a violation of provisions of the law or regulations in a legally effective judgment or order of Chapter VIII Execution Article 65 The parties must perform the legally effective judgment or order of the people’s court. If a citizen, a legal person or any other If an administrative organ refuses to perform the judgment or order, the people’s court of first instance may adopt the following (1) informing the bank to transfer from the administrative organ’s account the amount of the fine that should be returned or the damages (2) imposing a fine of 50 to 100 yuan per day on an administrative organ that fails to pe RULES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE THE PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF WATER POLLUTION
Chapter I General Provisions Article 1 These Rules are formulated according to provisions of Article 2 Competent departments under the State Council and local Economic and construction departments of people’s governments at various Article 3 Funds, materials and equipment needed for the prevention and Article 4 Local supplementary water environment quality standards and Article 5 Units and individuals having made remarkable contributions to Article 6 When projecting the minimum discharge of a dam of large or Article 7 With regard to the planning and adjustment of various water Article 8 With regard to construction projects using imported Article 9 Enterprises and institutions discharging pollutants into water Those discharging pollutants in excess of the national or local pollutant Overall pollutant discharge indexes for newly constructed, reconstructed Overall pollutant discharge indexes for the existing enterprises and Measures for the administration of pollutant discharge license shall be Article 10 With submission of a Reporting and Registration Form for Article 11 When any pollutant treatment facilities are to be dismantled Article 12 Units who are ordered to make elimination or controlling of Environmental protection department shall inspect the elimination or Article 13 For making on-site inspections on the pollutant discharging Article 14 When making on-site inspections, the environmental protection (1) the situation of pollutant discharge; (2) the situation of functioning, operation and management of the (3) models of the monitoring instruments and equipment and the results of (4) monitoring and analysis methods adopted and monitoring records; (5) the situation of the elimination or control ordered to be completed (6) information about accidents and relevant records; (7) information about the adoption and use of productive technologies and (8) other information and materials related to the prevention and control Article 15 If a water pollution accident is caused by an enterprise or Upon receipt of the preliminary report on the water pollution accident, Article 16 When any sewage outfall needs to be relocated, the pollutant Article 17 If any sewage outfall is to be located near a water body Article 18 When industrial waste water or urban sewage is used for Article 19 Ships navigating inland rivers shall be equipped with Ships without pollution-prevention equipment or with the equipment that Article 20 Ships navigating inland rivers must hold pollution-prevention Article 21 Harbors and wharves shall be equipped with receiving and Waste oil, residual oil or refuse of ships shall not be discharged into Article 22 Ships in harbor to conduct the following operations must (1) washing decks or holds of ships carrying poisonous goods or dusty (2) discharging ballasting water, hold washing water, waste water from (3) making use of anti-oil chemicals. Article 23 When loading or unloading a ship in harbor or wharf with oil Article 24 If an accident occurs to a ship resulting in causing or Article 25 Units engaging in shipbuilding or ship repairing, Article 26 In exploiting groundwater from multiple aquifers, layered (1) aquifers with salt water, semi-salt water or brine water; (2) polluted aquifers; (3) aquifers with poisonous or harmful elements in excess of the (4) aquifers with underground hot water, hot spring or mineral water Article 27 When any exploration project needs to expose or run through Article 28 If any grotto or civil air defenses is to be used for other Article 29 If a mine shaft or pit discharges poisonous or harmful waste Article 30 Water used for artificial recharge of groundwater shall Article 31 Fines under Article 37 of the Law of the People’s Republic of (1) those who commit the act listed in Item (1), Paragraph 1, Article 37 (2) those who commit the act listed in Item (2), Paragraph 1, Article 37 (3) those committing the act listed in Item (3), Paragraph 1, Article 37 (4) those who commit the act listed in Item (4), Paragraph 1, Article 37 (5) those who commit the act listed in Item (5), Paragraph 1, Article 37 Article 32 A fine made under Paragraph 1, Article 38 of the Law of the Article 33 Fines under Article 39 of the Law of the People’s Republic of (1) enterprises or institutions causing a water pollution accident may be (2) if heavy economic losses are caused, the fine shall be 30% of the Article 34 Those, without a pollutant discharge license or a temporary Those discharging pollutants not in accordance with provisions by the Article 35 A fine given by the environmental protection department of A fine given by the environmental protection department of the A fine given by the environmental protection department of the people’s Article 36 Paying the fee for pollutant discharge or for excess Article 37 In case of any discrepancy between China’s law and any Article 38 Relevant departments of the State Council and people’s Article 39 These Rules shall enter into force on September 1, 1989. CIRCULAR OF THE GENERAL OFFICE OF THE STATE COUNCIL CONCERNING THE APPROVAL AND TRANSMISSION OF SUGGESTIONS SUBMITTED BY THE STATE TAXATION ADMINISTRATION CONCERNING THE APPRAISAL, RECTIFICATION, AND STRICT CONTROL OF TAX REDUCTIONS AND EXEMPTIONS
The report “Suggestions Concerning the Appraisal, Rectification, and Last year, after the promulgation of “Decisions Concerning the Better 1. In order to strictly control the blind development of some special The reduction or exemption of taxes on all aforesaid items that have 2. For importing market-saturated goods, consumer goods for which market 3. Appraisal and rectification of tax reductions or exemptions for various 4. The unified preferential policy of tax reductions or exemptions for 5. All localities and departments must strictly implement the uniform 6. In order to make greater efforts to cut down the scale of 7. The tax authorities at various levels shall strengthen their 8. The appraisal and rectification of tax reductions or exemptions is a CITY PLANNING LAW OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE LAW
Category | LITIGATION | Organ of Promulgation | The National People’s Congress | Status of Effect | In Force |
Date of Promulgation | 1989-04-04 | Effective Date | 1990-10-01 |
Administrative Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China |
---|
Contents
Chapter I General Provisions
Chapter II Scope of Accepting Cases
Chapter III Jurisdiction
Chapter IV Participants in Proceedings
Chapter V Evidence
Chapter Vl Bringing a Suit and Accepting a Case
Chapter VII Trial and Judgment
Chapter VII Execution
Chapter IX Liability for Compensation for Infringement of Rights
Chapter X Administrative Procedure Involving Foreign Interests
Chapter XI Supplementary Provisions
(Adopted at the Second Session of the Seventh National People’s Congress
on April 4, 1989, promulgated by Order No. 16 of the President of the People’s
Republic of China on April 4, 1989, and effective as of October 1, 1990)
Contents
Chapter I General Provisions
Chapter II Scope of Accepting Cases
Chapter III Jurisdiction
Chapter IV Participants in Proceedings
Chapter V Evidence
Chapter VI Bringing a Suit and Accepting a Case
Chapter VII Trial and Judgment
Chapter VIII Execution
Chapter IX Liability for Compensation for Infringement of Rights
Chapter X Administrative Procedure Involving Foreign Interest
Chapter XI Supplementary Provisions
Chapter I General Provisions
Article 1 Pursuant to the Constitution, this Law is enacted for the
purpose of ensuring the correct and prompt handling of administrative cases
by the people’s courts, protecting the lawful rights and interests of
citizens, legal persons and other organizations, and safeguarding and
supervising the exercise of administrative powers by administrative organs in
accordance with the law.
Article 2 If a citizen, a legal person or any other organization
considers that his or its lawful rights and interests have been infringed upon
by a specific administrative act of an administrative organ or its personnel,
he or it shall have the right to bring a suit before a people’s court in
accordance with this Law.
Article 3 The people’s courts shall, in accordance with the law, exercise
judicial power independently with respect to administrative cases, and shall
not be subject to interference by any administrative organ, public
organization or individual.
The people’s courts shall set up administrative divisions for the handling
of administrative cases.
Article 4 In conducting administrative proceedings, the people’s courts
shall base themselves on facts and take the law as the criterion.
Article 5 In handling administrative cases, the people’s courts shall
examine the legality of specific administrative acts.
Article 6 In handling administrative cases, the people’s courts shall, as
prescribed by law, apply the systems of collegial panel, withdrawal of
judicial personnel and public trial and a system whereby the second instance
is the final instance.
Article 7 Parties to an administrative suit shall have equal legal
positions.
Article 8 Citizens of all nationalities shall have the right to use their
native spoken and written languages in administrative proceedings.
In an area where people of a minority nationality live in concentrated
communities or where a number of nationalities live together, the people’s
courts shall conduct adjudication and issue legal documents in the language or
languages commonly used by the local nationalities.
The people’s courts shall provide interpretation for participants in
proceedings who do not understand the language or languages commonly used by
the local nationalities.
Article 9 Parties to an administrative suit shall have the right to
debate.
Article 10 The people’s procuratorates shall have the right to exercise
legal supervision over administrative proceedings.
Chapter II Scope of Accepting Cases
Article 11 The people’s courts shall accept suits brought by citizens,
legal persons or other organizations against any of the following specific
administrative acts:
(1) an administrative sanction, such as detention, fine, rescission of a
license or permit, order to suspend production or business or confiscation of
property, which one refuses to accept;
(2) a compulsory administrative measure, such as restricting freedom of
the person or the sealing up, seizing or freezing of property, which one
refuses to accept;
(3) infringement upon one’s managerial decision-making powers, which is
considered to have been perpetrated by an administrative organ;
(4) refusal by an administrative organ to issue a permit or license, which
one considers oneself legally qualified to apply for, or its failure to
respond to the application;
(5) refusal by an administrative organ to perform its statutory duty of
protecting one’s rights of the person and of property, as one has applied for,
or its failure to respond to the application;
(6) cases where an administrative organ is considered to have failed to
issue a pension according to law;
(7) cases where an administrative organ is considered to have illegally
demanded the performance of duties; and
(8) cases where an administrative organ is considered to have infringed
upon other rights of the person and of property.
Apart from the provisions set forth in the preceding paragraphs, the
people’s courts shall accept other administrative suits which may be brought
in accordance with the provisions of relevant laws and regulations.
Article 12 The people’s courts shall not accept suits brought by
citizens, legal persons or other organizations against any of the following
matters:
(1) acts of the state in areas like national defence and foreign affairs;
(2) administrative rules and regulations, regulations, or decisions and
orders with general binding force formulated and announced by administrative
organs;
(3) decisions of an administrative organ on awards or punishments for its
personnel or on the appointment or relief of duties of its personnel; and
(4) specific administrative acts that shall, as provided for by law, be
finally decided by an administrative organ.
Chapter III Jurisdiction
Article 13 The basic people’s courts shall have jurisdiction as courts of
first instance over administrative cases.
Article 14 The intermediate people’s courts shall have jurisdiction as
courts of first instance over the following administrative cases:
(1) cases of confirming patent rights of invention and cases handled by
the Customs;
(2) suits against specific administrative acts undertaken by departments
under the State Council or by the people’s governments of provinces,
autonomous regions or municipalities directly under the Central Government;
and
(3) grave and complicated cases in areas under their jurisdiction.
Article 15 The higher people’s courts shall have jurisdiction as courts
of first instance over grave and complicated administrative cases in areas
under their jurisdiction.
Article 16 The Supreme People’s Court shall have jurisdiction as a court
of first instance over grave and complicated administrative cases in the whole
country.
Article 17 An administrative case shall be under the jurisdiction of the
people’s court in the locality of the administrative organ that initially
undertook the specific administrative act. A reconsidered case in which the
organ conducting the reconsideration has amended the original specific
administrative act may also be placed under the jurisdiction of the people’s
court in the locality of the administrative organ conducting the
reconsideration.
Article 18 A suit against compulsory administrative measures restricting
freedom of the person shall be under the jurisdiction of a people’s court in
the place where the defendant or the plaintiff is located.
Article 19 An administrative suit regarding a real property shall be
under the jurisdiction of the people’s court in the place where the real
property is located.
Article 20 When two or more people’s courts have jurisdiction over a
suit, the plaintiff may have the option to bring the suit in one of these
people’s courts. If the plaintiff brings the suit in two or more people’s
courts that have jurisdiction over the suit, the people’s court that first
receives the bill of complaint shall have jurisdiction.
Article 21 If a people’s court finds that a case it has accepted is not
under its jurisdiction, it shall transfer the case to the people’s court that
does have jurisdiction over the case. The people’s court to which the case has
been transferred shall not on its own initiative transfer it to another
people’s court.
Article 22 If a people’s court which has jurisdiction over a case is
unable to exercise its jurisdiction for special reasons, a people’s court at a
higher level shall designate another court to exercise the jurisdiction.
If a dispute arises over jurisdiction between people’s courts, it shall be
resolved by the parties to the dispute through consultation. If the dispute
cannot be resolved through consultation, it shall be reported to a people’s
court superior to the courts in dispute for the designation of jurisdiction.
Article 23 People’s courts at higher levels shall have the authority to
adjudicate administrative cases over which people’s courts at lower levels
have jurisdiction as courts of first instance; they may also transfer
administrative cases over which they themselves have jurisdiction as courts of
first instance to people’s courts at lower levels for trial.
If a people’s court deems it necessary for an administrative case of first
instance under its jurisdiction to be adjudicated by a people’s court at a
higher level, it may report to such a people’s court for decision.
Chapter IV Participants in Proceedings
Article 24 A citizen, a legal person or any other organization that
brings a suit in accordance with this Law shall be a plaintiff.
If a citizen who has the right to bring a suit is deceased, his near
relatives may bring the suit.
If a legal person or any other organization that has the right to bring a
suit terminates, the legal person or any other organization that succeeds to
its rights may bring the suit.
Article 25 If a citizen, a legal person or any other organization, brings
a suit directly before a people’s court, the administrative organ that
undertook the specific administrative act shall be the defendant.
For a reconsidered case, if the organ that conducted the reconsideration
sustains the original specific administrative act, the administrative organ
that initially undertook the act shall be the defendant; if the organ that
conducted the reconsideration has amended the original specific administrative
act, the administrative organ which conducted the reconsideration shall be the
defendant.
If two or more administrative organs have undertaken the same specific
administrative act, the administrative organs that have jointly undertaken the
act shall be the joint defendants.
If a specific administrative act has been undertaken by an organization
authorized to undertake the act by the law or regulations, the organization
shall be the defendant.
If a specific administrative act has been undertaken by an organization as
entrusted by an administrative organ, the entrusting organ shall be the
defendant.
If an administrative organ has been abolished, the administrative organ
that carries on the exercise of functions and powers of the abolished organ
shall be the defendant.
Article 26 A joint suit shall be constituted when one party or both
parties consist of two or more persons and the administrative cases are
against the same specific administrative act or against the specific
administrative acts of the same nature and the people’s court considers that
the cases can be handled together.
Article 27 If any other citizen, legal person or any other organization
has interests in a specific administrative act under litigation, he or it may,
as a third party, file a request to participate in the proceedings or may
participate in them when so notified by the people’s court.
Article 28 Any citizen with no capacity to take part in litigation shall
have one or more legal representatives who will act on his behalf in a suit.
If the legal representatives try to shift their responsibilities onto each
other, the people’s court may appoint one of them as the representative of the
principal in litigation.
Article 29 Each party or legal representative may entrust one or two
persons to represent him in litigation.
A lawyer, a public organization, a near relative of the citizen bringing
the suit, or a person recommended by the unit to which the citizen bringing
the suit belongs or any other citizen approved by the people’s court may be
entrusted as an agent ad litem.
Article 30 A lawyer who serves as an agent ad litem may consult materials
pertaining to the case in accordance with relevant provisions, and may also
investigate among and collect evidence from the organizations and citizens
concerned. If the information involves state secrets or the private affairs of
individuals, he shall keep it confidential in accordance with relevant
provisions of the law.
With the approval of the people’s court, parties and other agents ad litem
may consult the materials relating to the court proceedings of the case,
except those that involve state secrets or the private affairs of individuals.
Chapter V Evidence
Article 31 Evidence shall be classified as follows:
(1) documentary evidence;
(2) material evidence;
(3) audio-visual material;
(4) testimony of witnesses;
(5) statements of the parties;
(6) expert conclusions; and
(7) records of inquests and records made on the scene.
Any of the above-mentioned evidence must be verified by the court before
it can be taken as a basis for ascertaining a fact.
Article 32 The defendant shall have the burden of proof for the specific
administrative act he has undertaken and shall provide the evidence and
regulatory documents in accordance with which the act has been undertaken.
Article 33 In the course of legal proceedings, the defendant shall not by
himself collect evidence from the plaintiff and witnesses.
Article 34 A people’s court shall have the authority to request the
parties to provide or supplement evidence.
A people’s court shall have the authority to obtain evidence from the
relevant administrative organs, other organizations or citizens.
Article 35 In the course of legal proceedings, when a people’s court
considers that an expert evaluation for a specialized problem is necessary,
the expert evaluation shall be made by an expert evaluation department as
specified by law. In the absence of such a department, the people’s court
shall designate one to conduct the expert evaluation.
Article 36 Under circumstances where there is a likelihood that evidence
may be destroyed or lost or difficult to obtain later on, the participants
in proceedings may apply to the people’s court for the evidence to be
preserved. The people’s court may also on its own initiative take measures to
preserve such evidence.
Chapter Vl Bringing a Suit and Accepting a Case
Article 37 A citizen, a legal person or any other organization may,
within the scope of cases acceptable to the people’s courts, apply to an
administrative organ at the next higher level or to an administrative organ as
prescribed by the law or regulations for reconsideration, anyone who refuses
to accept the reconsideration decision may bring a suit before a people’s
court; a citizen, a legal person or any other organization may also bring a
suit directly before a people’s court.
In circumstances where, in accordance with relevant provisions of laws or
regulations, a citizen, a legal person or any other organization shall first
apply to an administrative organ for reconsideration and then bring a suit
before a people’s court, if he or it refuses to accept the reconsideration
decision, the provisions of the laws or regulations shall apply.
Article 38 If a citizen, a legal person or any other organization applies
to an administrative organ for reconsideration, the organ shall make a
decision within two months from the day of the receipt of the application,
except as otherwise provided for by law or regulations. Anyone who refuses to
accept the reconsideration decision may bring a suit before a people’s court
within 15 days from the day of the receipt of the reconsideration decision.
If the administrative organ conducting the reconsideration fails to make a
decision on the expiration of the time limit, the applicant may bring a suit
before a people’s court within 15 days after the time limit for
reconsideration expires, except as otherwise provided for by law.
Article 39 If a citizen, a legal person or any other organization brings
a suit directly before a people’s court, he or it shall do so within three
months from the day when he or it knows that a specific administrative act has
been undertaken, except as otherwise provided for by law.
Article 40 If a citizen, a legal person or any other organization fails
to observe the time limit prescribed by law due to force majeure or other
special reasons, he or it may apply for an extention of the time limit within
ten days after the obstacle is removed; the requested extention shall be
decided by a people’s court.
Article 41 The following requirements shall be met when a suit is brought:
(1) the plaintiff must be a citizen, a legal person or any other
organization that considers a specific administrative act to have infringed
upon his or its lawful rights and interests;
(2) there must be a specific defendant or defendants;
(3) there must be a specific claim and a corresponding factual basis for
the suit; and
(4) the suit must fall within the scope of cases acceptable to the
people’s courts and the specific jurisdiction of the people’s court where it
is filed.
Article 42 When a people’s court receives a bill of complaint, it shall,
upon examination, file a case within seven days or decide to reject the
complaint. If the plaintiff refuses to accept the decision, he may appeal to a
people’s court.
Chapter VII Trial and Judgment
Article 43 A people’s court shall send a copy of the bill of complaint to
the defendant within five days of filing the case. The defendant shall provide
the people’s court with the documents on the basis of which a specific
administrative act has been undertaken and file a bill of defence within ten
days of receiving the copy of the bill of complaint. The people’s court shall
send a copy of the bill of defence to the plaintiff within five days of
receiving it.
Failure by the defendant to file a bill of defence shall not prevent the
case from being tried by the people’s court.
Article 44 During the time of legal proceedings, execution of the
specific administrative act shall not be suspended. Execution of the specific
administrative act shall be suspended under one of the following circumstances:
(1) where suspension is deemed necessary by the defendant;
(2) where suspension of execution is ordered by the people’s court at the
request of the plaintiff because, in the view of the people’s court, execution
of the specific administrative act will cause irremediable losses and
suspension of the execution will not harm public interests; or
(3) where suspension of execution is required by the provisions of laws or
regulations.
Article 45 Administrative cases in the people’s courts shall be tried in
public, except for those that involve state secrets or the private affairs of
individuals or are otherwise provided for by law.
Article 46 Administrative cases in the people’s courts shall be tried by
a collegial panel of judges or of judges and assessors. The number of members
of a collegial panel shall be an odd number of three or more.
Article 47 If a party considers a member of the judicial personnel to
have an interest in the case or to be otherwise related to it, which may
affect the impartial handling of thc case, the party shall have the right to
demand his withdrawal.
If a member of the judicial personnel considers himself to have an
interest in the case or to be otherwise related to it, he shall apply for
withdrawal.
The provisions of the two preceding paragraphs shall apply to court
clerks, interpreters, expert witnesses and persons who conduct inquests.
The withdrawal of the president of the court as the chief judge shall be
decided by the court’s adjudication committee; the withdrawal of a member of
the judicial personnel shall be decided by the president of the court; the
withdrawal of other personnel shall be decided by the chief judge. Parties who
refuse to accept the decision may apply for reconsideration.
Article 48 If the plaintiff refuses to appear in court without justified
reasons after being twice legally summoned by the people’s court, the court
shall consider this an application for the withdrawal of the suit; if the
defendant refuses to appear in court without justified reasons, the court may
make a judgment by default.
Article 49 If a participant in the proceedings or any other person
commits any of the following acts, the people’s court may, according to the
seriousness of his offence, reprimand him, order him to sign a statement of
repentance or impose upon him a fine of not more than 1,000 yuan or detain him
for not longer than 15 days; if a crime is constituted, his criminal
responsibility shall be investigated:
(1) evading without reason, refusing to assist in or obstructing the
execution of the notice of a people’s court for assistance in its execution by
person who has the duty to render assistance;
(2) forging, concealing or destroying evidence;
(3) instigating, suborning or threatening others to commit perjury or
hindering witnesses from giving testimony;
(4) concealing, transferring, selling or destroying the property that has
been sealed up, seized or frozen;
(5) using violence, threats or other means to hinder the personnel of a
people’s court from performing their duties or disturbing the order of the
work of a people’s court; or
(6) insulting, slandering, framing, beating or retaliating against the
personnel of a people’s court, participants in proceedings or personnel who
assist in the execution of duties;
A fine or detention must be approved by the president of a people’s court.
Parties who refuse to accept the punishment decision may apply for
reconsideration.
Article 50 A people’s court shall not apply conciliation in handling an
administrative case.
Article 51 Before a people’s court announces its judgment or order on an
administrative case, if the plaintiff applies for the withdrawal of the suit,
or if the defendant amends its specific administrative act and, as a result,
the plaintiff agrees and applies for the withdrawal of the suit, the people’s
court shall decide whether or not to grant the approval.
Article 52 In handling administrative cases, the people’s courts shall
take the law, administrative rules and regulations and local regulations as
the criteria. Local regulations shall be applicable to administrative cases
within the corresponding administrative areas.
In handling administrative cases of a national autonomous area, the
people’s courts shall also take the regulations on autonomy and separate
regulations of the national autonomous area as the criteria.
Article 53 In handling administrative cases, the people’s courts shall
take, as references, regulations formulated and announced by ministries or
commissions under the State Council in accordance with the law and
administrative rules and regulations, decisions or orders of the State Council
and regulations formulated and announced, in accordance with the law and
administrative rules and regulations of the State Council, by the people’s
governments of provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under
the Central Government, of the cities where the people’s governments of
provinces and autonomous regions are located, and of the larger cities
approved as such by the State Council.
If a people’s court considers regulations formulated and announced by a
local people’s government to be inconsistent with regulations formulated and
announced by a ministry or commission under the State Council, or if it
considers regulations formulated and announced by ministries or commissions
under the State Council to be inconsistent with each other, the Supreme
People’s Court shall refer the matter to the State Council for interpretation
or ruling.
Article 54 After hearing a case, a people’s court shall make the
following judgments according to the varying conditions:
(1) If the evidence for undertaking a specific administrative act is
conclusive, the application of the law and regulations to the act is correct,
and the legal procedure is complied with, the specific administrative act
shall be sustained by judgment.
(2) If a specific administrative act has been undertaken in one of the
following circumstances, the act shall be annulled or partially annulled by
judgment, or the defendant may be required by judgment to undertake a specific
administrative act anew:
a. inadequacy of essential evidence;
b. erroneous application of the law or regulations;
c. violation of legal procedure;
d. exceeding authority; or
e. abuse of powers.
(3) If a defendant fails to perform or delays the performance of his
statutory duty, a fixed time shall be set by judgment for his performance of <
PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE OF CHINESE INVESTORS IN CHINESE-FOREIGN EQUITY JOINT VENTURES AND CONTRACTUAL JOINT VENTURES
The State Administration of Foreign Exchange Provisions Governing the Foreign Exchange of Chinese Investors in Chinese-foreign Equity Joint Ventures and Contractual Joint Ventures the State Administration of Foreign Exchange January 7, 1989 The following Provisions are enacted to strengthen control over the foreign exchange of Chinese investors in Chinese-foreign equity Article 1 The Chinese investor in a joint venture may, starting from the day the joint venture obtains its business licence, retain all the Article 2 When Chinese employees of a joint venture go abroad on duty together with foreign employees out of the need of business, the expenses Article 3 When Chinese employees of a joint venture go abroad on duty alone, their expenses may be computed according to the standards set by Article 4 The surplus foreign exchange resulting from the difference between the sum received according to the standards of joint venture and Article 5 The Chinese investor of a joint venture shall settle with the bank the foreign exchange it has received as wages of the Chinese employees, Article 6 Unless approved by the exchange control authorities, the Chinese investor of a joint venture may be punished by the said authorities (1) depositing those foreign exchange receipts that are required by State regulations to be settled with the bank in the foreign exchange (2) using such foreign exchange to import commodities or defray other expenses through the bank accounts of the joint venture; or (3) depositing such foreign exchange abroad. Article 7 The right to interpret these provisions resides in the State Administration of Exchange Control. Article 8 These Provisions shall enter into force on March 1, 1989. |
The State Administration of Foreign Exchange
1989-01-07
RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE NATIONAL PEOPLE’S CONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA
Rules of Procedure for the National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China | |
CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982 – page 22
NOTES
(1) The enacting clause was repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893, 56-57 Vict., c. 14 (U.K.). It read as...
Disclaimer: There is no confidential attorney-client relationship formed by using Laws.com website and information provided on this site is not legal advice. For legal advice, please contact your attorney. Attorneys listed on this website are not referred or endorsed by this website. By using Laws.com you agree to Laws.com Terms Of Use.
© LAWS.COM NETWORK 2023-2024
|