Home Gentrification

Gentrification

MEASURES FOR THE REDUCTION OR POSTPONEMENT OF THE PAYMENT OF PATENT FEES

Decree of the State Intellectual Property Office

No. 39

The Measures for the Reduction or Postponement of the Payment of Patent Fees have been constituted in accordance with Article 98
of the Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Patent Law of the People’s Republic of China. They are hereby promulgated and
shall go into effect as of November 13, 2006.
Tian Lipu, Director of the State Intellectual Property Office

October 12, 2006

Measures for the Reduction or Postponement of the Payment of Patent Fees

Article 1

These Measures are specially constituted under the provisions of the Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Patent Law of the
People’s Republic of China and related documents.

Article 2

In case an applicant or a patent owner has any difficulty in paying the relevant patent fees, it/he may apply with the State Intellectual
Property Office (hereinafter referred to as the SIPO) for reducing or postponing the repayment of relevant fees under these Measures.

Article 3

Upon approval of the SIPO, the following patent fees may be reduced or postponed,

(1)

application fees (wherein the printing expenses for announcement and application surcharges may not be reduced or postponed);

(2)

application examining fees for invention patents;

(3)

annual fees (within 3 years since the year when the patent right is authorized);

(4)

application maintaining fees for invention patents; and

(5)

reviewing fees.

Article 4

If the applicant or patent owner is an individual, he may apply for reducing or postponing the payment of 85 % of the application
fees, application examining fees for invention patents and annual fees as well as 80% of the application maintaining fees for invention
patents and reviewing fees.

If the applicant or patent owner is an entity, it may apply for reducing or postponing the payment of 70 % of the application fees,
application examining fees for invention patents and annual fees as well as 60% of the application maintaining fees for invention
patents and reviewing fees.

Where two or more individuals or any individual and entity jointly apply for a patent, they may apply for reducing or postponing the
payment of 70% of the application fees, application examining fees for invention patents and annual fees as well as 60% of the application
maintaining fees for invention patents and reviewing fees.

Where two or more entities jointly apply for a patent, no patent fee may be reduced or postponed.

Article 5

The patent applicant may apply for reducing or postponing the payment of 5 kinds of fees as prescribed in Article 3 of these Measures
when applying for a patent. After the SIPO accepts his application for patent, the application fees may not be reduced or postponed
any more. The applicant or patent owner may only apply for reducing or postponing the payment of fees not yet due, and shall apply
for reducing or postponing the payment of fees 2 and a half months before the expiration of the term for fee payment.

Article 6

When applying for reducing or postponing the payment of patent fees, the applicant or patent owner shall submit an application for
the reduction or postponement of the payment of patent fees, to which relevant certification documents shall be attached when it
so requires.

The Application for the Reduction or Postponement of the Payment of Patent Fees shall be affixed with the signatures or seals of all
applicants or patent owners.

Article 7

When applying for the reduction or postponement of the payment of patent fees, the individual shall faithfully fill in his annual
income in the application for the reduction or postponement of the payment of patent fees, and shall, when it so requires, submit
the certification on his economic difficulties produced by the competent department of patent of the people’s government at or above
the municipal level in light of the requirements of the SIPO.

Where two or more individuals jointly apply for reducing or postponing the payment of patent fees, they shall respectively and faithfully
fill their annual incomes in the application for the reduction or postponement of the payment of patent fees, and shall, when it
so requires, submit the certification on their economic difficulties produced by the competent department of patent of the people’s
government at or above the municipal level in light of the requirements of the SIPO.

When applying for reducing or postponing the payment of patent fees, an entity shall faithfully fill its economic difficulties in
its application for the reduction or postponement of the payment of patent fees, to which the certification as produced by the competent
department of patent of the people’s government at or above the municipal level shall be attached.

Where an individual and an entity jointly apply for reducing or postponing the payment of patent fees, the individual shall faithfully
fill his annual income in the application for the reduction or postponement of the payment of patent fees, and the entity shall fill
in its economic difficulties, to which the certification produced by the competent department of patent of the people’s government
at or above the municipal level shall be attached.

It shall be indicated in the certification produced by the competent department of patent of the people’s government at or above the
municipal level that the nature of the entity applying for reducing or postponing the payment patent fees is an enterprise, public
institution or organ as well as the conditions on its economic difficulties.

Article 8

After receiving an application for the reduction or postponement of the payment of patent fees, the SIPO shall undertake an examination
and make a decision on whether or not to approve it, and inform the applicant or patent owner of its decision to.

Article 9

Under any of the following circumstances, the application for reducing or postponing the payment of patent fees may not be approved:

(1)

where the application for the reduction or postponement of the payment of patent fees as constituted by the SIPO fails to be used;

(2)

where any of the applicants or patent owners fails to attach his/its signatures/ seals on the application for the reduction or postponement
of the payment of patent fees;

(3)

where any entity or individual that has filed an application for reducing or postponing the payment of patent fees fails to provide
relevant certification that satisfies the requirements of the provisions of Article 7 of these Measures;

(4)

where the annual income of an applicant or patent owner exceeds 25, 000 Yuan.

(5)

where the individual incomes of all the applicants or patent owners failed to be fully indicated in the application for the reduction
or postponement of the payment of patent fees;

(6)

where there are two or more applicants or patent owners; or

(7)

where the name of any applicant or patent owner indicated in the application for the reduction or postponement of the payment of patent
fees is inconsistent with that in the application for patent.

Article 10

The applicant shall, within the time limit as prescribed in the Patent Law as well as the Detailed Rules for Implementation thereof,
pay the relevant fees in full amount. Where any application for the reduction or postponement of the payment of patent fees is approved
by the SIPO, the amount of payment shall be the remnant sum after reduction or postponement.

Article 11

Where any decision on reducing or postponing the payment of patent fees is made yet the SIPO finds any mistake in this decision,
it may correct it by itself and inform the relevant applicant or patent owner of the corrected result.

Where any applicant or patent owner submits any false information or document when applying for reducing or postponing the payment
of patent fees, the SIPO shall, upon verification, revoke its decision on the application for reduction or postponement of the payment
of patent fees, and inform the relevant applicant or patent owner of making up the reduced or postponed fees within a designated
term. Where any party concerned fails to make up the expense or fails to make the full payment, the SIPO shall impose relevant punishment
under law.

Article 12

The applicant or patent owner, after obtaining the relevant economic benefits generated from his invention, shall make up the payment
of patent fees that have been reduced or postponed.



 
The State Intellectual Property Office
2006-10-12

 







REPLY OF THE CHINA INSURANCE REGULATORY COMMISSION ON RELEVANT ISSUES CONCERNING LARGE COMMERCIAL INSURANCES

Reply of the China Insurance Regulatory Commission on Relevant Issues concerning Large Commercial Insurances

Bao Jian Ting Han [2006] No. 294

Shanghai Branch of Mitsui Sumitomo at-sea Fire Insurance Co., Ltd.

We have received your Letter for Instructions on Relevant Issues concerning Large Commercial Insurances (No. 82 [2006] of Mitsui
Sumitomo Insurance Co.). Upon discussion, a reply is hereby given as follows:

As stipulated in the Circular of the China Insurance Regulatory Commission on Relevant Issues Concerning Large Commercial Insurance
Business and Master Policy Business (Bao Jian Fa [2002] No. 16), the group short-term health insurance and accidental injury insurance
bought buy a large industrial and commercial enterprise shall fall within the category of large commercial insurances. Meanwhile
other related provisions issued by the China Insurance Regulatory Commission shall be strictly observed.

The China Insurance Regulatory Commission

October 12, 2006



 
The China Insurance Regulatory Commission
2006-10-12

 







CIRCULAR OF THE GENERAL OFFICE OF STATE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ADMINISTRATION ON APPROVAL OF DESIGNATED PROCESSING AND UTILIZATION ENTITIES OF IMPORTED WASTE HARDWARE AND ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES, WASTE ELECTRICAL WIRE AND CABLE, AND WASTE ELECTROMOTORS OF 2007

Circular of the General Office of State Environmental Protection Administration on Approval of Designated Processing and Utilization
Entities of Imported Waste Hardware and Electrical Appliances, Waste Electrical Wire and Cable, and Waste Electromotors of 2007

Huan Ban [2006] No. 119

The Environmental Protection Bureaus (Departments) of all provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central
Government:

For the purpose of further standardizing the administration of processing and utilization entities of imported waste hardware and
electrical appliances, waste electrical wire and cable, and waste electromotors (hereinafter referred to as ” waste hardware and
electrical appliances type waste”), the State Environmental Protection Administration has decided, in the process of the approval
of designated processing and utilization entities of imported waste hardware and electrical appliances type waste (hereinafter referred
as ” designated entities”), to continue to carry out control of the aggregates and carry forward zone-enclosure administration and
to make optimal adjustment to designated entities. Related matters are hereby noticed as follows:

1.

The assessment procedure of designated entities shall be further standardized. The Environmental Protection Bureaus (Departments)
of all provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government shall organize assessment on existing
designated entities and enterprises that are under application for status as newly-added designated entities within their jurisdiction
strictly in accordance with the requirements prescribed in Examination and Assessment Criteria of Environmental Protection Acceptance
of Designated Processing and Utilization Enterprises of Imported Waste Hardware and Electrical Appliances, Waste Electrical Wire
and Cable and Waste Electromotors (Huan Han [2004] No. 344) (hereinafter referred to as Assessment Criteria). The assessment results
shall be notified to the public in line with procedures by means of news media such as local newspapers and websites with a notification
period of not less than 10 days. The Environmental Protection Bureaus (Departments) of all provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities
directly under the Central Government shall gather together and submit the name lists and relevant materials of entities who get
an assessment mark of 80 or above and have been through notification period to State Environmental Protection Administration for
examination and approval before November 20, 2006. Those who fail to meet the deadline shall not be accepted.

2.

Structural adjustment of existing designated entities shall be carried forward in an orderly way. In the process of the assessment
of designated entities, the Environmental Protection Bureaus (Departments) of all provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities
directly under the Central Government shall carry out serious examinations on existing designated entities. Decisive measures shall
be taken to discard and eliminate enterprises that fall short of Assessment Criteria, those of disorderly management and outdated
processing equipment and technologies, incompetent in prevention and control of pollution, with related waste operation records inconsistent
with de facto import, as well as those with records of violations of the law and regulations in particular. Those who did not actually
import and utilize waste in 2006 shall without exception be given an assessment as enterprises under application for status as newly-added
designated entities.

3.

Control of the aggregates shall be carried out and zone-enclosure administration shall be promoted. In 2007, principles of control
of the aggregates and survival of the fittest shall be applied to the approval of designated entities. Quantity of designated entities
within zones that are under “zone-enclosure administration” pilot scheme of imported waste processing approved by State Environmental
Protection Administration may be increased whereas that of designated entities outside of enclosure zones shall not be increased.
In case there is an actual need for an increase of designated entities, elimination of the last shall be imposed on existing designated
entities that fail to meet the assessment criteria while enterprises, those top-ranked ones with advanced technologies, standardized
management and up to the environmental protection standard, in particular, shall be selected among those under application for status
as newly-added designated entities that are up to the Assessment Criteria in accordance with their assessment results and shall be
submitted to State Environmental Protection Administration for examination and verification.

4.

The State Environmental Protection Administration shall carry out examinations and verification of application materials for designated
entities submitted by the Environmental Protection Bureaus (Departments) of all provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities
directly under the Central Government and shall organize some province-level environmental protection departments to make on-spot
inspections and mutual inspections into designated entities. As for those who are discovered of violations of the law and regulations
such as fraud and deception during the examinations and spot-inspections, the State Environmental Protection Administration shall
not give ratification to their status as designated entities and shall conduct serious investigation and handling hereupon in accordance
with the law. As regards local environmental protection departments with incompetent administration and knotty problems, the State
Environmental Protection Administration shall circulate a notice of criticism on them.

5.

The list of designated entities of 2007 examined and approved by the State Environmental Protection Administration shall be notified
to the public by dint of the portal of the State Environmental Protection Administration and the website of the Wastes Import Registration
Management Center and shall be affirmed and confirmed by promulgation.

Appendix￿￿Application Form for Designated Processing and Utilization Entities of Imported Waste Hardware and Electrical Appliances,
Waste Electrical Wire and Cable, and Waste Electromotors (Omitted)

General Office of State Environmental Protection Administration

October 13, 2006



 
General Office of State Environmental Protection Administration
2006-10-13

 







CIRCULAR OF THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND THE STATE ADMINISTRATION OF TAXATION CONCERNING SUPPLEMENTING THE LIST OF ENTERPRISES THAT EXPLOIT OFFSHORE OIL

Circular of the Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation concerning Supplementing the List of Enterprises that
Exploit Offshore Oil

Cai Shui [2006] No.143
October 11, 2006

Departments (Bureaus) of Finance and State Administration of Taxation Bureaus in all provinces, autonomous regions, municipalities
directly under the Central Government, and city specifically designated in the state plan, the Bureau of Finance of Xinjiang Production
and Construction Corporations.:

According to the request of China National Petroleum Corporation, List of Enterprises that Exploit Offshore Petroleum, which is attached
to the Circular of the Ministry of Finance and the State Administrative of Taxation on Applying VAT Refund to Ocean Engineering Structures(Cai
Shui [2003] No,46), is hereby supplemented by adding China National Petroleum Corporation Ocean Engineering Co. Ltd. under the item
of China National Petroleum Corporation.



 
The Ministry of Finance, the State Administration of Taxation
2006-10-11

 







ANNOUNCEMENT NO. 75, 2006 OF MINISTRY OF COMMERCE, ON POSTPONING ANTI-DUMPING INVESTIGATION TERM ON BUTYL ALCOHOL

Announcement No. 75, 2006 of Ministry of Commerce, on Postponing Anti-dumping Investigation Term on Butyl Alcohol

[2006] No. 75

Announcement No. 66, 2005 of Ministry of Commerce is issued on October 14, 2005, deciding to start anti-dumping investigation on Butyl
Alcohol imported from Russia, the U.S., South Africa, Malaysia, EU and Japan.

Since the case is particular and complicated, the Ministry of Commerce, in accordance with Article 26 of the Anti-dumping Regulations
of People’s Republic of China, decided to postpone the investigation term of this case for another 6 months, namely ending on April
14, 2007.

Ministry of Commerce

October 12, 2006



 
The Ministry of Commerce
2006-10-12

 







CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982 – page 22

NOTES (1) The enacting clause was repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893, 56-57 Vict., c. 14 (U.K.). It read as...